Skip to main content

String Theory says we might have at least 10 dimensions!!!

But wait, this isn't only strange thing about it.

Quantum physics is weird. Once you say you understand it, you get 5 more reasons to argue it. Same is in case here. the normal model of Quantum mechanics says everything is made up of elementary particles like quark, electrons, protons. String theory says everything is just a string vibrating in its own way. yes, it summates more complexities but it solves many decade old problems.

Just look at the standard model which says everything it made up of 12 elementary particles
The standard model
We have six quarks and six leptons which make up particles. photons bind the electromagnetic waves, gluons are the "glue" that binds up the strong nuclear forces, while W and Z bosons are responsible for weak nuclear forces. As we know there are four fundamental forces Gravity, Electromagnetism, Strong and Weak nuclear forces. Astonishingly scientists aren't able to explain the most famous force-Gravity. And here comes the string theory, assuming everything to be vibrating strings just like guitar chords which produce different sounds ,here different particles it becomes simple to assume an imaginary particle called Graviton( responsible for gravity), which scientist have proposed but it isn't proved & Kudos the mystery is solved. Moreover finally the four forces are now unified!

Arise of 10 dimensions

Well, maybe this isn't this simple, most of models of string theory require at least 10 dimensions(some even go till 26) to work. But how come we perceive only up-down-right-left and time?
there are many assumptions in it. One says that other  dimensions are compressed up in a manner that we can't perceive them? It's like when you see paper from front you say it has length and breadth. but when you see it side wise you say its only an edge. some other hypothetic theories say that other higher dimensions are binded up in Branes. 

References:-
Higher dimensions of strings in space-time

More information:-
Rob Knoops' Ted talk on higher dimensions

Thank you,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding String Theory

Hey Guys, I am back with something interesting. "The string theory". We all have ability to perceive the beautiful world around us. But our desire to explore the origin of our world and from what this things are made? to get answer of this question numerous scientists have researched about it. getting deep into it we have discovered smaller and smaller particles breaking the earlier limits. String Theory is also a one attempt to get into the depths of smallest fundamental particles. When we go for the higher documentations for reference or see tough explanation we find it too difficult to understand, I have tried to make it simple and also provided the harder way explanation. So let's start... Lagrangian  describes the motion of an object in a plane w.r.t time. Now take lagrangian of motion of two dimensional entity in Field-World "X", so the action that describes the motion of this entity is basically area of World-Sheet using pull-back metric from am

Lagrangian

Imagine you have a big land piece and you want to build a beautiful mansion there. For this task you have to hire designers, masons, painter and all sort of workers. getting this work done from them is a pretty difficult task. And you suddenly you came across a machine that can do all sort of work alone. This is more or less same in the case of a lagrange The word Lagrangian can refer to a mathematical quantity or a description of a way/method to look at physical events. The Lagrangian method is normally contrasted with the Eulerian method. If you follow the motion of few moving things and devise equations to describe the motion and how the other attributes change along the path, then you are using the Lagrangian method. If you stick to ground and observe these moving things and again devise equations to describe the motion and the changes in the attributes of the moving objects, then you are using the Eulerian method. Like being in a plane and putting rules for its flight, or sitti

Feyman's Sum-Over-The-Path Approach

The basic idea behind Feynman's sum-over-paths (or sum-over-histories) approach is as follows: Assume that a particle can travel between two points A and B by a - possibly infinite - number of different paths. Each one of these paths will have a certain probability associated with it. In quantum mechanical terms, these probabilities are encoded in the wavefunction that describes the particle, which assigns to each possible path a different probability amplitude ; the square modulus of this amplitude gives the corresponding probability.  The crucial point is that these different amplitudes have a wavelike nature, and as they spread through space they interfere with each other, their respective wave patterns either reinforcing or canceling each other out at various points. And if you sum over all the amplitudes of all the different paths, i.e. you sum-over-histories, then the different amplitudes will reinforce or cancel each other in such a way that the only path that survives this